• Rezultati Niso Bili Najdeni

Povprečno število točk na potestu glede na predznanje

10. VIRI IN LITERATURA

Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s Constructionism: What’s the

difference? Pridobljeno s:

https://learning.media.mit.edu/content/publications/EA.Piaget%20_%20Papert.pdf (17. 3.

2021)

Ackermann, E. (2000). Relating to Things that Think Animated Toys, Artificial Creatures, V-Avatars. Play of Ideas and Ideas of Play, 13, 1—5.

Aho, V. A. (2012). Computation and Computational Thinking. The Computer Journal, 55(7), 832—835.

Aidan, (2018). Our Ozobots Review and Educational Tips. Core Electronics. Pridobljeno s:

https://core-electronics.com.au/tutorials/what-are-ozobots.html (2. 4. 2021)

Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.

Barr, D., Harrison, J., Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone.

Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20—23. Pridobljeno s https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ918910 (11. 3. 2021)

Barr, V. in Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48—

54.

Beaumont, C. in Fox, C. (2003). Learning programming: Enhancing quality through problem-based learning. V 4th Annual LTSN-ICS Conference (str. 90—95). Dostopno na:

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.516.8969&rep=rep1&type=pdf (8. 3. 2021)

Bell, T. in Vahrenhold, J. (2018). CS Unplugged—How Is It Used, and Does It Work?. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11011, 497–521.

Bell, T., Witten, I. H. in Fellows, M. (1998). Computer Science Unplugged … off-line activities and games for all ages. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

Blumenthal, H. (2015). Meet the Ozobots. Digital insider. Pridobljeno s:

https://diginsider.com/2015/02/09/meet-the-ozobots/ (8. 3. 2021)

Brennan, K. in Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. V Annual American Educational Research Association

meeting (str. 1—25). Pridobljeno s:

https://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf (17. 3.

2021)

63

Bukovec, M. (2018). Uporaba Lego Mindstorms EV3 robotov pri poučevanju fizičnega računalništva v slovenskih osnovnih šolah (diplomsko delo). Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta, Ljubljana.

Burnett, M. M. (1999). Visual Programming. V Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Campers Explore Programming Apps with Ozobots. (2016). The Research Center for

Educational Technology (RCET) Blog. Pridobljeno s:

http://rcetatt.blogspot.com/2016/07/campers-explore-programming-apps-with.html (17. 3.

2021)

Catlin, D. in Woollard J. (2014). Educational Robots and Computational Thinking. V Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education (str. 144—151). Pridobljeno s:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264043999_Educational_Robots_and_Computati onal_Thinking (11. 3. 2021)

Cerar, Š. in Nančovska Šerbec, I. (2019). Fizično računalništvo za učenje računalništva. V Izzivi in priložnosti uporabe informacijsko komunikacijske tehnologije v pedagoškem procesu na področju naravoslovja, tehnologije in matematike (str. 131—149). Pridobljeno s:

https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=123309&lang=slv (17. 3. 2021)

Chalmers, C. (2018). Robotics and computational thinking in primary school. International journal of child-computer interaction. 17, 93—100.

CSTA. (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K-12 education. Pridobljeno s https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/ct-documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (11. 3. 2021)

Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Ng, T., Selby, C. in Woollard, J. (2014). Developing computational thinking in the classroom: a framework. Pri

Fojtik, R. (2017). The Ozobot and education of programming. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 5, 8—16. Pridobljeno s: www.prosoc.eu (8. 3.

2021)

Krauss, J. in Prottsman, K. (2016). Computational thinking and coding for every student: the teacher getting-started guide. Corwin: SAGE Publications.

Hmelio-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?.

Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235—266.

Kerndl, M. (2010). Učno okolje, ki omogoča kakovostno samostojno učenje. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 3(2/3), 105—119.

64

Marentič Požarnik, B. (1998). Kako pomembna so pojmovanja znanja, učenja in poučevanja za uspeh kurikularne reforme. Sodobna pedagogika, 49 (3), 244—261.

Marn, U. (2006). Konstruktivizem v šoli kot podlaga učenja nenasilnih vzorcev vedenja. V Socialna pedagogika (Ljubljana), 10(3), 365—386.

Mayerova, K. in Veselovska, M. (2014). How we did introductory lesson about robot. V Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education (str. 127—134).

Millwood, R., Bresnihan, N., Walsh, D. in Hooper, J. (2018). Review of Literature on Computational Thinking. Pridobljeno s: https://ncca.ie/media/3557/primary-coding_review-of-literature-on-computational-thinking.pdf (11. 3. 2021)

Nishida, T., Idosaka, Y., Hofuku, Y., Kanemune, S. in Kuno, Y. (2008). New Methodology of Information Education with “Computer Science Unplugged”. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5090, 241—252.

Nančovska Šerbec, I., Kaučič, B. in Rugelj, J. (2007). Pair Programming as a Modern Method of Teaching Computer Science. International journal: emerging technologies in learning, 2(3), 45—49.

O’Sullivan, D., Igoe, T. (2004). Physical Computing: Sensing and Controlling the Physical World with Computers. Boston: Thomson Course Technology PTR.

Ozobot. (b. d. a). Introduction to Ozobot: Get to Know Evo. Pridobljeno s:

https://classroom.ozobot.com/lessons/lnHsHKD0kXTgueqAiT7Pg7jQT3 (20. 4. 2021)

Ozobot. (b. d. b). Workshop 1 All-around introduction Ozobot moves and reads codes.

Pridobljeno s: https://classroom.ozobot.com/lessons/lnnQARrhm9QfyC8MCx6a9LVw6n (20.

4. 2021)

Ozobot. (b. d. c). Workshop 2 All-around introduction Ozobot moves and reads codes.

Pridobljeno s: https://classroom.ozobot.com/lessons/ln7Blp1WxJRaCKZL8VypoaEg4t (20. 4.

2021)

Ozobot. (2017). R4 Digital Dialogue. Pridobljeno s: https://www.esc4.net/services/new-dl-home/tech-bytes/ozobot (20. 4. 2021)

Ozobot – the little robot toy. (b. d.) Pridobljeno s: https://artificialbrain.net/ozobot-little-robot-toy/38077/ (20. 4. 2021)

Papert, S. (1999). Eight big ideas behind the constructionist learning lab. Pridobljeno s:

https://inventtolearn.com/8-big-ideas-of-the-constructionist-learning-lab/ (10. 3. 2021) Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms—Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

65

Payne, S. (b. d.) Introduction to Ozobot and Colour Codes. Pridobljeno s:

https://www.digitaltechnologieshub.edu.au/teachers/lesson-ideas/introduction-to-ozobot-and-colour-codes (10. 3. 2021)

Preston, D. (2005). Pair programming as a model of collaborative learning: a review of the research. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20(4), 39—45.

Przybylla, M. in Romeike, R. (2014a). Key Competences with Physical Computing. V Proceedings of Key Competencies in Informatics and ICT 2014 (str. 351—361). Pridobljeno s

https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/8290/file/cid07_S351-361.pdf (27. 2. 2021)

Przybylla, M. in Romeike, R. (2014b). Physical Computing and its Scope – Towards a Constructionist Computer Science Curriculum. Informatics in Education, 13 (2), 241–254 Strokovna skupina RINOS. (2018). Snovalci digitalne prihodnosti ali le uporabniki? Poročilo strokovne delovne skupine za analizo prisotnosti vsebin računalništva in informatike v programih osnovnih in srednjih šol ter za pripravo študije o možnih spremembah (RINOS).

Pridobljeno s : https://skupnost.sio.si/mod/forum/view.php?id=309488 (1. 3. 2021) Selby, C. in Woollard, J. (2013). Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition. V Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, 2014. Pridobljeno s: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/356481 (13. 3. 2021)

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4—14.

Skrzypek, D. in Zalewska, A. (2020). Ozobot Evo Review: Coding with a robot in your pocket.

Pridobljeno s: https://www.robocamp.eu/en/blog/ozobot-evo-review/ (17. 3. 2021)

Slangen, L., van Keulen, H. in Gravemeijer, K. (2010). What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 449—469.

Strmčnik, F. (1995). Problemsko orientiran pouk kot didaktično načelo. Pedagoška obzorja, 10(3—4), 3—15.

Threekunprapa, A. in Yasri, P. (2020). Unplugged Coding Using Flowblocks for Promoting Computational Thinking and Programming among Secondary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 207—222.

Tsai, C. Y. (2019). Improving students' understanding of basic programming concepts through visual programming language: The role of self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 224—232.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. 49(3), 33—35.

66

Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717—3725.

Zaviršek, M. (2015). Preverjanje znanja računalništva, pridobljenega z aktivnostmi za učenje računalništva brez računalnika (magistrsko delo). Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta, Ljubljana.

67

11. PRILOGE