• Rezultati Niso Bili Najdeni

93 Ackoff, Russell. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applies Systems Analysis, 16: 3–9.

99 Anderson, Ronald D. (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research says about Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, (13) 1: 1–12.

280 Angerer, Tatjana (1986). Biologija za šesti razred OŠ, 2. Natis. Ljubljana: DZS.

238 Antoniou, Panayiotis; Kyriakides, Leonidas; Creemers, Bert (2011). Investigating the Effectiveness of a Dynamic Integrated Approach to Teacher Professional Development. CEPS Journal, (1) 1: 13–39.

157 Arora, Anjana G.; Kean, Elizabeth; Anthony, Joan L. (2000). An Interpretive Study of a Teacher's Evolving Practice of Elementary School Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11: 155–172.

66 Ausubel, David P. (1970). The Use of Ideational Organizers in Science Teaching. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED050930].

161 Back, Judy; Czerniah, Charlene M.; Lumpe, Andrew T. (2000). An Exploratory Study of Teachers' Beliefs Regarding the Implementation of Constructivism in Their Classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11: 323–343.

205 Backhoff, Eduardo; Larrazolo, Norma; Rosas, Martin (2000). The level of difficulty and discrimination power of the Basic Knowledge and Skills Examination (EXHCOBA). Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2 (1). Spletni vir [12. 12. 2008 http://redie.uabc.mx/ vol2no1/ contents-backhoff.html].

34 Bailin, Sharon (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science & Education, (11) 4: 361–375.

63 Bandura, Albert (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New York:

Prentice-Hall.

64 Bandura, Albert (1994). Self-efficacy. V: Ramachaudran, V. S. (ur.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, Vol. 4: 71–81. Spletni vir [13.11.2010 http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html].

90 Barab, Sasha; Squire, Kurt (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, (13) 1: 1–14.

195 Barton, John; Haslett, Tim (2007). Analysis, Synthesis, Systems Thinking and the Scientific Method: Rediscovering the Importance of Open Systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, (24): 143–155.

245 Bayer, John A. (2009). Perceptions of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education Teachers on Implementing an interdisciplinary curriculum at Blaine Senior High, A research paper for master science degree. Spletni vir [13. 11.

2010 www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2009/2009bayerj.pdf].

102 Beane, James A. (1997). Curriculum Integration: designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia Univarsity.

282 Begon, Michael; Townsend, Colin R.; Harper, John L. (2006). Ecology From Individuals to Ecosystems. Malden, USA:

Blackwell Publishing.

152 Ben - Chaim, David; Ron, Salit; Zoller, Uri (2000). The Disposition of Eleventh-Grade Science Students Toward Critical Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9: 149–159.

51 Benziger, Katherine I. (2004). Thriving in Mind: The Art and Science of Using Your Whole Brain. KBA Publishing; Revised edition.

182 Beverly Clock (2009, 09. maj). Wikipedia, prosta enciklopedija. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/

Beverly_Clock].

227 Birbili, Maria (2006). Mapping Knowledge: Concept Maps in Early Childhood Education. Early Childhood Research &

Practice (ECRP), (8) 2. Spletni vir [13.11.2010 http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v8n2/birbili.html].

154 Black, Kathie (2004). Science in the trenches: An exploration of four pre-service teachers' first attempts at teaching science in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2: 25–44.

249 Bobnar, Maja (2007). Medpredmetno povezovanje matematike in naravoslovja in tehnike. V: Krek, Janez idr. (ur.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli.

Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta: 181–196.

131 Boddy, Naomi; Watson, Kevin; Aubusson, Peter (2003). Trial of the Five Es: A Referent Model for Constructivist Learning.

Research in Science Education, 33: 27–42.

103 Bolak, Karen; Bialach, Donna; Dunphy, Maureen (2005). Standards-based, thematic units integrate the arts and energize students and teachers. Middle School Journal, (31) 2: 57–60.

252 Bolak, Karen; Bialach, Donna; Dunphy, Maureen (2005). Standards-based, thematic units integrate the arts and energize students and teachers. Middle School Journal, (31) 2: 57–60.

110 Booth, Sweeneya, L.; Stermana, John D. (2007). Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, (23) 2/3: 285–312.

236 Borko, Hilda (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, (33) 8: 3–15.

141 Boyd, Ronald T. C. (1989). Improving teacher evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 1. Spletni vir [13.

11. 2010 http://edresearch.org/pare/getvn.asp?v=1&n=7].

75 Brown, John S.; Collins, Allan; Duguid, Paul (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, (18) 1: 32–42.

108 Browne, Neil M. (2002). The Mandate for Interdisciplinarity in Science. Science & Education, 11: 513–522.

151 Brumen, Milan; Glažar, Saša A.; Logaj, Vinko; Pufič, Tatjana; Verčkovnik, Tatjana; Zupan, Anka (1998). Učni načrt: program osnovnošolskega izobraževanja. Naravoslovje 7, Delovno telo za Naravoslovje v 6. razredu, Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

76 Bruner, Jerome (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

78 Bruner, Jerome (1979). On knowing: essays for the left hand, razširjena izdaja. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

272 Cardellini, Liberato (2010). Acquiring and assessing structural representations of students’ knowledge. V: Valenčič-Zuljan, Milena; Vogrinc, Janez (ur.), Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation.

Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani: 225–252.

165 Chang Shu-Nu; Chiu, Mei-Hung (2005). The Development of Authentic Assessments to Investigate Ninth Graders’ Scientific Literacy: In the Case of Scientific Cognition Concerning the Concepts of Chemistry and Physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3: 117–140.

177 Chi, Michelene T. H.; Glaser, Robert; Rees, Ernest (1982). Expertise in problem solving. V: Sternberg, Robert J. (ur.), Advances in psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum: 7–75.

159 Chinn, Clark A.; Brewer, William F. (1998). Theories of knowledge acquisition. V: International Handbook of Science Education. Kluwer academic publishers: 97–113.

258 Cook, Wayne C. (1970). Ecosystem Approach in Teaching. Journal of Range Management, (23) 6: 387–391.

6 Costelloe, Timothy (2008). Giambattista Vico. V: Edward N. Zalta (ur.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/ fall2008/ entries/vico/].

179 Crawford, Barbara A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (44) 4: 613–642.

85 Crawford, Kathryn (1996). Vygotskian approaches to human development in the information era. Educational Studies in Mathematics, (31): 43–62.

220 Crow, Gary M.; Pounder, Diana G. (2000). Interdisciplinary Teacher Teams: Context, Design, and Process. Educational Administration Quarterly, (36) 2: 216–254.

237 Davis, Elizabeth A.; Krajcik, Joseph S. (2005). Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning.

Educational Researcher, (34) 3: 3–14.

37 Davson - Gale, Peter (2002). Science, Values and Objectivity. Science & Education, 11: 191–202.

38 Davson - Gale, Peter (2004). Philosophy of Science, Critical Thinking and Science Education. Science & Education, 13:

503–517.

26 Davson - Galle, Peter (2004). Understanding: ‘Knowledge’, ‘Belief’ and ‘Understanding’. Science & Education, 13: 591–598.

214 de Klerk, G. (2008). Classical test theory (CTT). V: M. Born; C.D. Foxcroft; R. Butter (ur.), Online Readings in Testing and Assessment. International Test Commission. Spletni vir [12. 12. 2008 http://www.intestcom.org/ Publications/

ORTA.php].

89 Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry.

Educational Researcher, (32) 1: 5–8.

52 Dewey, John (1938). Experience & education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi, Touchstone 1997 edition.

86 Driscoll, Marcy P. (1994). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

199 Driscoll, Marcy P.; Dick, Walter (1999). New research paradigms in instructional technology: An inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, (47) 2: 7–18.

146 Driver, Rosalind; Asoko, Hilary; Leach, John; Mortimer, Eduardo; Scott, Philip (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, (23) 7: 5–12.

139 Durham, Mary E. (1997). Secondary science teacher's responses to students questions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8: 257–267.

129 Ellis, Robert A.; Taylor, Charlotte E.; Drury, Helen (2005). Evaluating writing instruction through an investigation of students’

experiences of learning through writing. Instructional Science, 33: 49–71.

148 Ferbar, Janez; Vodopivec, Irena; Cvetrežnik, Dragica; Glažar, Saša A.; Hostnik, Igor; Kralj, Metka; Novak, Marta; Velikonja, Anton (1998) Učni načrt: program osnovnošolskega izobraževanja. Naravoslovje in tehnika, Predmetna kurikularna komisija za spoznavanje okolja. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

279 Ferk - Savec, Vesna, Dolničar, Danica, Glažar, Saša. A., Sajovic, Irena, Šegedin, Primož, Urbančič, Matej, Vogrinc, Janez, Vrtačnik, Margareta, Wissiak - grm, Katarina S., Devetak, Iztok (2007). Učiteljeva identifikacija konkretnih problemov pri poučevanju naravoslovnih predmetov. V: Vrtačnik, Margareta (ur.), Devetak, Iztok (ur.), Sajovic, Irena (ur.).

Akcijsko raziskovanje za dvig kvalitete pouka naravoslovnih predmetov. Ljubljana: Naravoslovnotehniška fakulteta:

Pedagoška fakulteta, 11–34.

39 Feynman, Richard P. (1969). What Is Science. The Physics Teacher, (7) 6: 313.

215 Finn, Hugh; Maxwell, Marika; Claver, Michael (2002). Why does experimentation matter in teaching ecology? Journal of Biological Education, (36) 4: 158–162.

194 Fisher, Kath; Bennett-Levy, James; Irwin, Ros (2003). What a GAS! Action research as a peer support process for postgraduate students. UltiBASE article Resources, 2003 (11). Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/

Articles/ nov03/ fisher1.htm].

136 Fošnarič, Samo; Osvald, Magda (2005). Težave učencev pri razumevanju naravoslovja na prehodu iz prve v drugo triado osnovne šole. Sodobna pedagogika, (56) 2: 94–103.

144 Fowler, Michael (2003). Galileo and Einstein: Using History to Teach Basic Physics to Nonscientists. Science & Education, 12: 229–231.

263 Friel, Susan N.; Curcio, Frances R.; Bright, George W. (2001). Making Sense of Graphs: Critical Factors Influencing Comprehension and Instructional Implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, (32) 2: 124–158.

84 Galloway, Chad. M. (2001). Vygotsky's Constructionism. V: M. Orey (ur.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, amd technology. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/].

269 García Rodicio, Héctor; Sánchez, Emilio (2010). Making Instructional Explanations Effective: The Role of Learners' Awareness of their Misunderstandings. V: Valenčič-Zuljan, Milena; Vogrinc, Janez (ur.), Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation. Ljubljana. Pedagoška fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani: 277–296.

262 Gardner, Howard (1995). The unschooled mind: how children think and how schools should teach, 1. izdaja. New York:

Basic Books.

46 Gardner, Howard (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

48 Gardner, Howard (2003). Multiple Intelligences After Twenty Years, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 21, 2003. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 www.pz.harvard.edu/ Pis/

HG_MI_after_20_years.pdf].

33 Gartmeier, Martin; Bauer, Johannes; Gruber, Hans; Heid, Helmut (2008). Negative Knowledge: Understanding Professional Learning and Expertise. Journal Vocations and Learning, (1) 2: 87–103.

11 Gelwick, Richard (2007). Fifty years of discovering personal knowledge, The rise and development of the Polanyi Society.

Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, (34) 3: 18–30.

225 George, Adrian V.; Read, Justin. R.; Barrie, Simon. C.; Bucat, Robert. B.; Buntine, Mark. A.; Crisp, Geoffrey. T.; Jamie, Ian.

M.; Kable, Scot. H. (2009). What makes a good laboratory learning exercise? Student feedback from the ACELL project, v Gupta-Bhowon, Minu (2009). Chemistry Education in the ICT Age: 363-376, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9732-4_34.

80 Gil - Pérez, Daniel; Guisasola, Jenaro; Moreno, Antonio; Cachapuz, Antonio; Pessoa De Carvalho, Anna M.; Martínez Torregrosa, Joaquín; Salinas, Julia; Valdés, Pablo; González, Eduardo; Gené Duch, Anna; Dumas-Carré, Andrée;

Tricárico, Hugo; Gallego, Rómulo (2002). Defending Constructivism in Science Education. Science & Education, 11, 557–571.

164 Glažar, Saša A. (2006). Preverjanje in ocenjevanje znanja v naravoslovju, Naravoslovje v teoriji in šolski praksi: pogledi in izkušnje. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo.

226 Glažar, Saša A.; Kornhauser, Aleksandra (1990). Pojmovne mape. Vzgoja in izobraževanje, (21) 2: 8–20.

1 Glažar, Saša A.; Plut - Pregelj, Leopoldina; Pergar - Kuščer, Marjanca; Krnel, Dušan; Vogrinec, Janez; Urbančič, Matej;

Hudošček, Milan (2005). Evalvacijska študija: vpliv ocenjevanja znanja na kakovost znanja učencev in na njihov interes za naravoslovje: uvajanje novega učnega predmeta v 7. razredu in prizadevanja za kakovostno

naravoslovno znanje učencev: evalvacijska študija. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fakulteta.

278 Gomez - Zwiep, Susan (2008). Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of Students’ Science Misconceptions: Implications for Practice and Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, (19) 5: 437–454.

74 Greeno, James G. (1994). Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review, (101) 2: 236–342.

28 Groves, Fred H.; Pugh, Ana F. (2002). Cognitive Illusions as Hindrances to Learning Complex Environmental Issues.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11: 381–390.

230 Hammann, Marcus; Thi - Thanh; Phan H.; Ehmer, Maike; Grimm, Tobias (2008). Assessing pupils’ skills in experimentation.

Journal of Biological Education, 42 (2): 66-73, DOI=10.1080/00219266.2008.9656113.

277 Hamza, Karim M.; Wickman, Per-Olof (2007). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, (92) 1: 141–164.

125 Harlow, Ann; Jones, Alister (2004). Why Students Answer TIMSS Science Test Items the Way They Do. Research in Science Education, 34: 221–238.

120 Hastedt, D.; Sibberns, H. (2005). Differences between multiple choice items and constructed response items in the IEA TIMSS surveys. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 31: 145–161.

224 Hawkes, Stephen. J. (2004). Chemistry Is Not a Laboratory Science. Journal of Chemical Education, (81) 9: 1257

23 Hejný, Milan (2005). Understanding Students Understanding Mathematics, Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking International Consortium. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://ct-net.net/tc_sample_5-2].

207 Helberg, Clay (1995). Pitfalls of Data Analysis or How to Avoid Lies and Damned Lies. Spletni vir [12. 12. 2008 http://my.execpc.com/~helberg/pitfalls/].

19 Hewstone, Miles; Fincham, Frank; Foster, Jonathan (2005). Psychology, BPS Textbooks in Psychology. The British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

133 Hin Wai Yung, Benny; Kee Tao, Ping (2004). Advancing Pupils within the Motivational Zone of Proximal Development: A Case Study in Science Teaching. Research in Science Education, 34: 403–426.

248 Hodnik - Čadež, Tatjana (2008). Učitelj kot raziskovalec medpredmetnega povezovanja. V: Krek, Janez idr. (ur.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli.

Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta: 131–149.

266 Hofstein, Avi; Mamlok - Naaman, Rachel (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, (8) 2: 105–107.

223 Högström, Per; Ottander, Christina; Beckert, Sylvia (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, (40) 4: 505–523.

270 Horvat, Barbara (2011). O refleksiji učencev pri pouku. Sodobna pedagogika, (62) 1: 142–158.

36 Höttecke, Dietmar (2000). How and What Can We Learn From Replicating Historical Experiments? A case study. Science and Education, 9: 343–362.

197 Hozjan, Dejan (2003). Različnost interpretacij objektivnosti v kvalitativnem pedagoškem empiričnem raziskovanju. Sodobna pedagogika, (54) 2: 124–136.

156 Hudson, Peter (2004). Toward Identifying Pedagogical Knowledge for Mentoring in Primary Science Teaching. Journal of Science Education and Technology (13) 2: 215–225.

92 Huitt, William G. (2001). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://chiron.valdosta.edu/ whuitt/ col/ affsys/ humed.html].

116 Japelj - Pavešić, Barbara; Magajna, Zlatan; Drobnič - Vidic, Andreja; Žakelj, Amalija; Čuček, Mojca; Brečko, Barbara N.;

Perat, Zvonko; Makarovič, Matej; Klokočovnik, Alenka (2002). Tretja mednarodna raziskava matematike in naravoslovja IEA TIMSS in druga mednarodna raziskava o informacijski tehnologiji v izobraževanju IEA sites ter vključevanje izsledkov v slovenski izobraževalni sistem: poročilo projekta. Ljubljana: Center IEA raziskave, Pedagoški inštitut.

32 Jarvis, Peter (2003). Izkustveno učenje in pomen izkušnje. Sodobna pedagogika, (54) 1: 94–103.

172 Jenkins, Edgar W. (2000). Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?. Science & Education, 9: 599–610.

122 Jerald, Craig. D. (2006). "Teach to the Test?" Just Say No. Issue Brief, Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://www.centerforcsri.org], 1–6.

18 Johnstone, Alex H. (2000). Teaching of Chemistry - Logical of Psychological?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, (1) 1: 9–15.

178 Jonassen, David H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, (48) 4: 63–85.

240 Juriševič, Mojca (2010). Creativiti in the zone of proximal motivational development. V: Valenčič - Zuljan, Milena; Vogrinc, Janez (ur.), Facilitating Effective Student Learning through Teacher Research and Innovation. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani: 415–429.

35 Kalman, Calvin S. (2002). Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Courses: A Philosophical Approach. Science &

Education, 11: 83–94.

275 Kang, Sukjin; Scharmann, Lawrence C.; Noh, Taehee (2004), Reexamining the Role of Cognitive Conflict in Science Concept Learning. Research in Science Education, 34: 71–96.

221 Kaufman, Dorit; Grennon Brooks, Jacqueline (1996). Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Teacher Education: A Constructivist Approach. TESOL Quarterly, (39) 2: 231–251.

95 Keating, Sarah B. (2006). Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

160 Keys, Carolyn W.; Kenedy, Virginia (1999). Understanding Inquiry Science Teaching in Context: A Case Study of an Elementary Teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10: 315–333.

15 Kilgore, Deborah W. (2001). Critical and Postmodern Perspectives on Adult Learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89: 53–62.

268 Kipnis, Nahum (2011). Errors in Science and their Treatment in Teaching Science. Science & Education, (20) 7–8: 655–685, DOI: 10.1007/s11191-010-9289-0.

100 Kirschner, Paul A.; Sweller, John; Clark, Richard E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.

Educational Psychologist, (41) 2: 75–86.

261 Kirschner, Paul A.; Sweller, John; Clark, Richard E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.

Educational Psychologist, (41) 2: 75–86.

132 Klahr, David; Li, Junlei (2005). Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and Back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, (14) 2: 217–238.

101 Klein, Julie T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: history, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

259 Knapp, Alan K.; D’Avanzo, Charlene (2010). Teaching with principles: toward more effective pedagogy in ecology.

Ecosphere, (1) 6. Spletni vir [30. 03. 2011 http://www.esajournals.org/ doi/pdf/ 10.1890/ES10-00013.1].

67 Koffka, Kurt (1922). Perception: An introduction to the Gestalt-theorie, Psychological Bulletin. V: C. D. Green (ur.), Classics in the History of Psychology. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/ Koffka/ Perception/

perception.htm].

17 Kolb, David (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

21 Krathwohl, David R. (2002) A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview - Benjamin S. Bloom, University of Chicago, Theory Into Practice, Autumn, 2002. Spetni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://findarticles.com/ p/articles/ mi_m0NQM/ is_4_41/

ai_94872707].

115 Krnel, Dušan (1998). Razvoj pojma snovi: primerjava med ontogenezo in filogenezo: doktorska disertacija.

145 Krnel, Dušan (2001). Temelji naravoslovja (filozofija in zgodovina naravoslovja) kot del naravoslovnega kurikuluma.

Sodobna pedagogika, (52) 1: 164–185.

204 Krnel, Dušan (2006). Pošten poskus ali zakaj so težave pri določanju spremenljivk in konstant. Naravoslovna solnica, (10) 2:

34–35.

147 Krnel, Dušan; Cunder, Karmen; Antić, Milica G.; Janjac, Marina; Rakovič, Darja; Velkavrh, Alenka; Vrščaj, Dušan (2005).

Učni načrt: program osnovnošolskega izobraževanja. Spoznavanje okolja, Predmetna kurikularna komisija za spoznavanje okolja, 3. Natis. Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Zavod RS za šolstvo.

40 Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970 (1962)). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

59 Laird, Dugan (2003). Approaches to training and development: new perspectives in organizational learning, performance and change, 3 izdaja. Cambridge, Mass: Basic Books.

219 Langer, Judith A. (1986). Learning through Writing: Study Skills in the Content Areas. Journal of Reading, 29 (5): 400–406.

12 Larkin, Jill H.; Simon, Herbert A. (1987). Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science, (11), 65–99.

113 Laugksch, Rϋdiger C. (2000). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual Overview. Science Education, 84: 71–94.

88 Lavonen, Jari; Juuti, Kalle (2006). Design-Based Research in Science Education: One Step Towards Methodology. NordiNa:

Nordic Studies in Science Education, (4) 1: 54–68.

68 Lehar, Steven (2003). Gestalt isomorphism and the primacy of subjective conscious experience: A Gestalt Bubble model.

Behavioral and brain sciences, (26), 375–444.

140 Lemke, Jay L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. New York: Greenwood Press.

251 Lenček, Lea; Zorn, Bernarda (2008). Akcijsko raziskovanje s področja medpredmetnih povezav v petem razredu. V: Krek, Janez idr. (ur.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta: 406–416.

185 Lenski, Richard (2009). Long-term Experimental Evolution Project Site. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 https://myxo.css.msu.edu/

ecoli/ overview.html].

166 Levere, Trevor. H. (2006). What History Can Teach Us About Science: Theory and Experiment, Data and Evidence.

Interchange, 37: 115–128.

138 Lin, Chongde; Hu, Weiping; Adey, Philip; Shen, Jiliang (2003). The Influence of CASE on Scientific Creativity. Research in Science Education, 33: 143–162.

196 Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Guba, Egon G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

44 Lohman, David F. (1989). Human Intelligence: An Introduction to Advances in Theory and Research. Review of Educational Research, (59) 4: 333-373.

281 Lučovnik, Jurij (1978). Razvojni nauk: biologija za 8. razred osnovne šole. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.

62 Malone, John C. (2003). Advances in Behaviorism: It's Not What It Used to Be. Journal of Behavioral Education, (12) 2: 85–

89.

29 Marentič - Požarnik, Barica (2000). Psihologija učenja in pouka, učbenik. Ljubljana: DZS: 5.

169 Marentič - Požarnik, Barica (2003). Psihologija učenja in pouka. Ljubljana: DZS.

126 Marentič - Požarnik, Barica; Plut - Pregelj, Leopoldina (1980). Kakršno vprašanje takšen odgovor: priročnik o pedagoško-psiholoških osnovah zastavljanja kvalitetnih vprašanj pri pouku. Ljubljana: Zavod SR Slovenije za šolstvo.

130 Marentič - Požarnik, Barica; Plut - Pregelj, Leopoldina (2009) Moč učnega pogovora: poti do znanja z razumevanjem, 1. izd., 1. Natis. Ljubljana: DZS.

187 Marentič - Požarnik, Barica; Plut - Pregelj, Leopoldina (2009). Moč učnega pogovora - Poti do znanja z razumevanjem.

Ljubljana: DZS.

82 Marentič Požarnik, Barica (ur.) (2004). Konstruktivizem v šoli in izobraževanje učiteljev. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.

3 Markie, Peter (2008). Rationalism vs. Empiricism. V: Edward N. Zalta (ur.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/ fall2008/ entries/rationalism-empiricism/].

97 Marzano, Robert J. (2000). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

96 Marzano, Robert J.; Zaffron, Steve; Zraik, Linda; Robbins, Sanford L.; Loon, Lois (1995). A new paradigm for educational change. Education, (116) 2: 162–173.

57 Maslow, Abraham H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, (50) 4: 370–96. Spletni vir [13. 11. 2010 http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm].

128 Mason, Lucia; Boscolo, Pietro (2000). Writing and conceptual change. What changes? Instructional Science, 28: 199–226.

274 Mason, Lucija (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: The role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 26: 359–389.

137 Mathews, Phillip S. C. (2000). Learning Science: Some Insights from Cognitive Science. Science & Education, 9: 507–535.

198 Maxwell, Joseph A. (1992). Understanding and Validity in qualitative research. Harvard educational review, 62: 279–300.

79 Mayer, Richard E. (2004). "Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction". American Psychologist, (59) 1: 14–19.

192 Mažgon, Jasna (2001). Utemeljevanje akcijskega raziskovanja na kritiki tradicionalne metodologije in postavkah 'spora okoli pozitivizma'. Sodobna pedagogika, (52) 2: 36–48.

193 Mažgon, Jasna (2006). Od monometod h kombiniranim raziskovalnim pristopom. Sodobna pedagogika, (57/123) 5: 98–109.

5 McCormick, Matt (2006). Immanuel Kant – Metaphysics. V: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spletni vir [13. 11.

2010 http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/kantmeta.htm].

106 McDaniel, Elizabeth A.; Colarulli, Guy C. (2000). Collaborative Teaching in the Face of Productivity Concerns: The Dispersed Team Model. Innovative Higher Education, (22) 1: 19–36.

9 McWilliams, Spencer A. (1992) Indeterminacy and the Construction of Personal Knowledge. Tradition & Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical, (19) 2: 5–12.

222 Mencigar, Anita (2010). Laborant in laboratorijsko delo v osnovnih in srednjih šolah: diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta.

265 Merhar, Vida Kariz; Planinšič, Gorazd; Čepič, Mojca (2009). Sketching graphs - an efficient way of probing students’

conceptions. European Journal of Physics, (30): 163–175.

260 Michael, Joel (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in psychology education, 30: 159–167.

253 Michelsen, Claus; Sriraman, Bharath (2008). Does interdisciplinary instruction raise students’ interest in mathematics and the subjects of the natural sciences?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41: 231–244, DOI 10.1007/s11858-008-0161-5.

114 Miller, Jon D. (1983). Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus, (112) 2: 29–48.

13 Miller, Kent D. (2008). Simon and Polanyi on Rationality and Knowledge. Organization Studies, Jul 2008 (29): 933–955.

250 Mohorič, Lidija; Kalan, Katarina (2008). Medpredmetno povezovanje med matemailko, biologijo, kemijo in geografijo. V:

Krek, Janez idr. (ur.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli. Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta: 314–335.

50 Morgan, Harry. (1996). An analysis of Gardner's theory of multiple intelligence. Roeper Review, 18, 263–270.

94 Moseley, David; Baumfield, Vivienne; Elliott, Julian; Gregson, Maggie; Higgins, Steven; Miller, Jen; Newton, Douglas P.

(2005). Framework for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning. Cambridge University Press.

109 Mulej, Matjaž (2007). Systems theory: a worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans' thinking, decisions and action. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, (24) 3: 347–357.

109 Mulej, Matjaž (2007). Systems theory: a worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans' thinking, decisions and action. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, (24) 3: 347–357.

Outline

POVEZANI DOKUMENTI